Author/attorney David Moskowitz analyzes the 2020 fake elector scam launched by Donald Trump and suggests it could happen again this year.Is Another Fake Election Scam Ahead?
As the 2024 election looms on the horizon, familiar tensions surface around Donald Trump’s potential reactions should he not win against Vice President Kamala Harris.
Within these swirling uncertainties lies the grave specter of the infamous ‘fake elector’ scheme that marked the tumultuous 2020 election. An analysis of these past attempts to manipulate the electoral process may offer critical insights into potential risks for future elections.
Fake Electors: A Flashback to 2020
Reflecting on the 2020 election drama, we find a deeply concerning attempt to overturn the results in key swing states using fake electors. Attorney David Moskowitz recently shared his thoughtful examination of this attempted subversion through his book, Fake Elector Playbook: Lessons for the 2024 Election. The book unravels the coordinated legal efforts to disrupt the certification process in states like Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, Georgia, New Mexico, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.
The masterminds behind the 2020 scheme were lawyers like Kenneth Chesebro, who orchestrated the submission of fraudulent voting certificates. While several states saw fraudulent documents, it was Pennsylvania and New Mexico where the attempts did not result in actual crimes, highlighting the complexity and varied success of the strategy.
Chesebro, a Harvard Law School graduate with experience from the Bush-Gore election dispute, was pivotal in crafting a scheme where alternate electors presented fraudulent documents to legitimate federal entities, including the U.S. Senate.
Actors and Repercussions
Other notable players in this troubling episode include lawyers like Stephanie Lambert, whose rise to national representation for election-deniers demonstrates the perilous allure and broader ramifications for those caught in such schemes. As cases proceed, including Chesebro’s guilty plea in Georgia, one wonders what penalties may ultimately befall these actors.
Moskowitz’s narrative sheds light on the ongoing legal battles across affected states, highlighting varied judicial approaches and the broader implications on future elections. It becomes alarmingly clear that the robust legal framework designed to ensure electoral integrity remains a critical battleground for sustaining democracy.
The Rocky Road Ahead
While the past serves as a stark warning, many wonder if the very actors penalized might dare to repeat history. Indeed, some of those prosecuted express willingness to engage in similar actions for future elections. With an undercurrent of denial and misinformation, the path to electoral clarity remains fraught with challenges.
Reflecting on the commentary and predictions shared in the podcast, it’s evident that vigilance and legal advocacy are imperative. It’s a call to action for citizens, officials, and legal professionals alike to monitor and defend against any reemergence of such schemes.
The insights from David Moskowitz remind us that informed citizenry and resilient legal frameworks are our best defenses against electoral subversion. As tensions rise with the 2024 election, it’s imperative to remain vigilant, recognizing the power of information and the gravity of maintaining electoral integrity in preserving democracy.
View the transcript: Is Another Fake Elector Scam Ahead_