Is the FBI Targeting Dissent?
By Bob Gatty
Is the United States drifting toward a police state?
That’s the unsettling question raised by a recent FBI training initiative tied to a Trump directive aimed at cracking down on so-called “left-wing dissent.” According to reports, the Bureau is working with state and local law enforcement to identify potential threats tied to political activism.
But what does that really mean?
To get some answers, I turned to someone who knows the FBI from the inside out—Eric Robinson, a recently retired special agent who spent 24 years with the Bureau, including time working cases connected to the January 6 insurrection.
What he told me should give every American pause.
“There Are Two FBIs”
Robinson says the FBI isn’t a monolith.
“There’s the FBI in Washington—the one in the headlines—and then there’s the FBI in the field,” he explained.
The difference matters.
While political directives may originate in Washington, Robinson says their real-world impact is often filtered by agents on the ground who must still operate within the law.
“You can’t just investigate people for their beliefs,” he said. “There has to be a legitimate violation of federal law.”
That’s a critical safeguard—but it’s not foolproof.
The Push to “Find Antifa”
One of the most troubling aspects of Robinson’s account involves pressure to investigate left-wing groups—even when evidence simply wasn’t there.
During Trump’s presidency, Robinson said there was renewed emphasis on identifying threats tied to Antifa.
The problem?
Agents couldn’t find much to investigate.
“We’ve already been through this,” Robinson recalled telling colleagues. “There’s nothing out there.”
Yet the directive persisted.
That raises a serious question: When political narratives drive law enforcement priorities, what happens to the truth?
Whipsawed by Politics
Robinson described a system pulled in different directions depending on who’s in power.
Under Trump, attention focused on left-leaning activists. Under President Biden, the focus shifted toward right-wing extremism, including white supremacist groups.
“Society was whipsawing us back and forth,” he said.
For agents in the field, the challenge was staying grounded in facts and law—not politics.
January 6: Doing the Job—and Paying the Price
Robinson also revealed something many Americans likely haven’t considered:
Some FBI agents who worked January 6 cases later feared retaliation simply for doing their jobs.
Their names, he said, were circulated internally as part of political scrutiny.
“Agents were going to work wondering if they might be fired,” he told me.
That’s a chilling reality—and one that raises concerns about the independence of federal law enforcement.
The Epstein Failure
We also discussed the Jeffrey Epstein case, which Robinson views as a profound breakdown in justice.
His frustration wasn’t just with the crimes themselves—but with how the system handled them.
“I don’t want names released just to shame people,” he said. “I want prosecutions.”
That distinction is important. Accountability doesn’t come from headlines—it comes from the rule of law.
From Pastor to FBI SWAT
Robinson’s personal story is as compelling as his professional one.
Before joining the FBI, he spent 12 years as a Baptist minister. Then, almost overnight, he traded the pulpit for Quantico—and eventually became a member of an FBI SWAT team.
Why the dramatic change?
Stress.
“I had a headache every day for two years,” he said of his time in the ministry. “The day I got accepted into the FBI, the headaches stopped.”
Ironically, he left one high-pressure calling for another—but found clarity in the process.
Faith, Justice, and What He Learned
Robinson’s experiences in the FBI also reshaped his faith.
Working cases involving hate groups and extremism forced him to confront difficult contradictions—particularly when religious language was used to justify intolerance.
“I used to talk about speaking the truth in love,” he said. “Now I just love. That’s better.”
It’s a simple statement—but a powerful one.
What This Means for America
This conversation isn’t just about the FBI.
It’s about something bigger: the tension between power and accountability, between politics and justice, and between fear and freedom.
If law enforcement becomes a tool of political agendas—left or right—then the very foundation of democracy is at risk.
At the same time, Robinson’s insights offer a measure of reassurance. Many agents, he says, remain committed to the rule of law and the Constitution.
The question is whether that commitment will be enough.
Watch, Listen to the Full Interview
This is one of the most revealing conversations I’ve had on Lean to the Left.
👉Listen to the full episode here
And as always—
Stay informed. Speak up. Join the conversation.