Lean to the Left is a progressive media platform offering political commentary, fact-based news analysis, and expert interviews that expose threats to democracy and hold leaders accountable. Lean to the Left is an independent, evolving media platform. Member benefits will grow and adapt over time. Founded in 2017 as Not Fake News and rebranded in 2021, Lean to the Left brings together the work of journalist and author Bob Gatty and a talented team of contributing writers who deliver sharp, insightful content on the issues affecting Americans today.
Our podcast—launched as NFN Radio News before becoming The Lean to the Left Podcast—featured weekly interviews with authors, activists, experts, and political insiders, with hard-hitting commentary on the challenges facing our nation. What began as a podcast grew into a community of listeners and readers who care deeply about democracy, accountability, and civic engagement. At its close, the Lean to the Left podcast had reached nearly 850 episodes with a worldwide audience.
Lean to the Left: Stay Informed. Speak Up. Join the Conversation.
Trump’s Middle East Peace Lap: Real or Reality Show?
By Mark M. Bello
Let’s begin with a confession:
I find it extraordinarily difficult to praise anything Donald Trump does.
Maybe I’m biased. Or maybe, just maybe, I’m observant. When Trump takes a victory lap, I reflexively look for the fine print — it’s always there, buried beneath the boasting, self-promotion, and revisionist history that makes him the chosen one, his supporters’ Orange Jesus.
Here we are once more. This self-anointed peacemaker, the “only man” capable of bringing tranquility to the Middle East, is basking in a spotlight he created for himself. He pitches his 20-point peace plan, his diplomatic triumph, his leadership. He even claims to have ended years of bloodshed. Seriously?
Did he also part the Red Sea?
But is this latest “deal” — the Gaza ceasefire and hostage exchange — a real step toward peace?
Or another episode of Trump’s never-ending reality show?
Let’s separate substance from spectacle, shall we?
Reluctant Credit: Yes, He Helped
Begrudgingly, I concede: Trump deserves some credit.
After years of carnage and stalemate, guns have temporarily gone silent, and 20 hostages have come home. Lives have been saved. Talks resumed. Regional powers, including Egypt and Qatar, joined the table. And by most credible accounts, Trump and his team pushed hard — leveraging U.S. influence with Israel, corralling reluctant Arab states, and giving Netanyahu political cover to stand down. Analysts at Brookings, CFR, and CSIS all agree that his fingerprints are on the ceasefire.
So yes, he did something.
But as always with Trump, the problem isn’t the act — it’s the performance.
Saint Donald, the Self-Anointed
No legitimate statesman has ever claimed sole ownership of a fragile peace.
Not one.
Not Truman or Churchill. Not Carter or Clinton. Not even Sadat or Rabin. Only despots and dictators turn diplomacy into a one-man show.
Only Donald Trump.
Trump’s insistence that he alone is responsible for ending the war tells us everything about his style — and his insecurity. He’s not a unifier or a strategist. He’s a marketer, selling himself as a savior. This man cannot share credit—he must dominate the narrative, even when others — diplomats, mediators, regional leaders — do the real heavy lifting.
So instead of dignified diplomacy, we get the usual Trumpian theater: self-promotion masquerading as statesmanship. And predictably, it cheapens what might otherwise have been a meaningful achievement.
Celebration or Shiva?
While Trump was busy collecting applause, Israelis were dancing in the streets, waving flags, and celebrating the return of 20 hostages. And I get it — any life saved is worth celebrating.
But let’s be honest: Israel also released hundreds of convicted Palestinian prisoners — many of them dangerous militants — to bring the hostages home. Hundreds of Israelis died on October 7. Hundreds more during the war. Dozens died in captivity.
So, what, exactly, are we celebrating?
In Jewish tradition, times like this call for reflection, for Shiva, for solemn remembrance — not triumphalism. The symbolism feels wrong: a nation still grieving, a region still burning, and a former president taking bows as if he just ended World War II. Did we celebrate the return of survivors after 6 million died in the Holocaust? Privately, solemnly, yes. Publicly dancing in the square? Hardly. Maybe this is a bad analogy, but it troubles me. Did the joyous celebrants consider the families of those who didn’t make it?
Meanwhile, Hamas Lives.
If the Trump team truly believes Hamas has been defeated, they’re deluding themselves. Credible reports (Reuters, Bild, and others) suggest Hamas has reoccupied parts of Gaza not held by Israeli forces. These terrorists reportedly executed rival clan leaders and “suspected collaborators.” In some districts, they’ve resumed policing, patrolling, and rebuilding their networks.
In other words: they’re down, not out.
This so-called peace has done little to dislodge the very organization that ignited the war. Instead, it risks giving Hamas breathing room — time to rearm, regroup, and terrorize anew. And when that happens (not if), Trump’s “Nobel moment” will look less like a breakthrough and more like a blunder.
So, who Really Drew the Line?
Here’s the truth:
This deal happened not because of Trump, but because Israel finally said enough.
After years of fighting, mounting casualties, and relentless international pressure, Israel had squeezed Gaza dry. There was no “victory” left to claim, only humanitarian catastrophe and global condemnation. The Israeli government — with quiet support from Washington and a few friendly Arab states — decided to pivot. They saw the writing on the wall. They didn’t need Trump to tell them the obvious: the region had reached its breaking point.
So yes, Trump facilitated the fragile truce. But let’s be real — it was inevitable. He didn’t create peace; he merely arrived when everyone else was too exhausted to keep fighting.
And what kind of deal is he crowing about? Call it what you will — a ceasefire, a framework, a plan — but it isn’t peace. It’s a pause. The agreement is vague, unenforceable, and, by most expert assessments, doomed to unravel. Hamas hasn’t disarmed. Israel hasn’t fully withdrawn. No credible governance structure exists for Gaza. And where are the enforcement mechanisms?
What’s really being achieved here, besides a political reprieve and a brief news cycle of applause? At best, Israel buys time to rebuild and regroup. At worst, Hamas regroups, too. The only certain winner so far is Trump — politically and personally — basking in his favorite Trump the Deal-Maker illusion.
The Verdict
So yes, Donald Trump deserves some credit — a momentary nod — for nudging a battered region toward a temporary calm. But don’t kid yourselves. This is not the Camp David Accords. It’s not Oslo. It’s not even a durable ceasefire.
It’s a PR event dressed up as diplomacy, a photo op disguised as history.
Trump calls it peace. I call it political theater with better lighting.
If peace ever comes to Gaza, it will be because cooler heads and moral courage prevailed — not because one self-absorbed man craved applause. This “deal” is another of the many Trump productions: heavy on self-congratulation, light on substance, and destined to collapse under the weight of its own exaggeration.
Such is American and international life under the leadership of Donald J. Trump.
Mark M. Bello
Mark M. Bello is an attorney and author of 9 Zachary Blake Legal Thrillers and other legal themed novels and children’s books. For more information, please visit https://www.markmbello.com
Trump’s Middle East Peace Lap: Real or Reality Show?
Let’s begin with a confession:
I find it extraordinarily difficult to praise anything Donald Trump does.
Maybe I’m biased. Or maybe, just maybe, I’m observant. When Trump takes a victory lap, I reflexively look for the fine print — it’s always there, buried beneath the boasting, self-promotion, and revisionist history that makes him the chosen one, his supporters’ Orange Jesus.
Did he also part the Red Sea?
But is this latest “deal” — the Gaza ceasefire and hostage exchange — a real step toward peace?
Or another episode of Trump’s never-ending reality show?
Let’s separate substance from spectacle, shall we?
Reluctant Credit: Yes, He Helped
Begrudgingly, I concede: Trump deserves some credit.
After years of carnage and stalemate, guns have temporarily gone silent, and 20 hostages have come home. Lives have been saved. Talks resumed. Regional powers, including Egypt and Qatar, joined the table. And by most credible accounts, Trump and his team pushed hard — leveraging U.S. influence with Israel, corralling reluctant Arab states, and giving Netanyahu political cover to stand down. Analysts at Brookings, CFR, and CSIS all agree that his fingerprints are on the ceasefire.
So yes, he did something.
But as always with Trump, the problem isn’t the act — it’s the performance.
Saint Donald, the Self-Anointed
No legitimate statesman has ever claimed sole ownership of a fragile peace.
Not one.
Not Truman or Churchill. Not Carter or Clinton. Not even Sadat or Rabin. Only despots and dictators turn diplomacy into a one-man show.
Only Donald Trump.
Trump’s insistence that he alone is responsible for ending the war tells us everything about his style — and his insecurity. He’s not a unifier or a strategist. He’s a marketer, selling himself as a savior. This man cannot share credit—he must dominate the narrative, even when others — diplomats, mediators, regional leaders — do the real heavy lifting.
So instead of dignified diplomacy, we get the usual Trumpian theater: self-promotion masquerading as statesmanship. And predictably, it cheapens what might otherwise have been a meaningful achievement.
Celebration or Shiva?
While Trump was busy collecting applause, Israelis were dancing in the streets, waving flags, and celebrating the return of 20 hostages. And I get it — any life saved is worth celebrating.
But let’s be honest: Israel also released hundreds of convicted Palestinian prisoners — many of them dangerous militants — to bring the hostages home. Hundreds of Israelis died on October 7. Hundreds more during the war. Dozens died in captivity.
So, what, exactly, are we celebrating?
In Jewish tradition, times like this call for reflection, for Shiva, for solemn remembrance — not triumphalism. The symbolism feels wrong: a nation still grieving, a region still burning, and a former president taking bows as if he just ended World War II. Did we celebrate the return of survivors after 6 million died in the Holocaust? Privately, solemnly, yes. Publicly dancing in the square? Hardly. Maybe this is a bad analogy, but it troubles me. Did the joyous celebrants consider the families of those who didn’t make it?
Meanwhile, Hamas Lives.
If the Trump team truly believes Hamas has been defeated, they’re deluding themselves. Credible reports (Reuters, Bild, and others) suggest Hamas has reoccupied parts of Gaza not held by Israeli forces. These terrorists reportedly executed rival clan leaders and “suspected collaborators.” In some districts, they’ve resumed policing, patrolling, and rebuilding their networks.
In other words: they’re down, not out.
This so-called peace has done little to dislodge the very organization that ignited the war. Instead, it risks giving Hamas breathing room — time to rearm, regroup, and terrorize anew. And when that happens (not if), Trump’s “Nobel moment” will look less like a breakthrough and more like a blunder.
So, who Really Drew the Line?
Here’s the truth:
This deal happened not because of Trump, but because Israel finally said enough.
After years of fighting, mounting casualties, and relentless international pressure, Israel had squeezed Gaza dry. There was no “victory” left to claim, only humanitarian catastrophe and global condemnation. The Israeli government — with quiet support from Washington and a few friendly Arab states — decided to pivot. They saw the writing on the wall. They didn’t need Trump to tell them the obvious: the region had reached its breaking point.
So yes, Trump facilitated the fragile truce. But let’s be real — it was inevitable. He didn’t create peace; he merely arrived when everyone else was too exhausted to keep fighting.
And what kind of deal is he crowing about? Call it what you will — a ceasefire, a framework, a plan — but it isn’t peace. It’s a pause. The agreement is vague, unenforceable, and, by most expert assessments, doomed to unravel. Hamas hasn’t disarmed. Israel hasn’t fully withdrawn. No credible governance structure exists for Gaza. And where are the enforcement mechanisms?
What’s really being achieved here, besides a political reprieve and a brief news cycle of applause? At best, Israel buys time to rebuild and regroup. At worst, Hamas regroups, too. The only certain winner so far is Trump — politically and personally — basking in his favorite Trump the Deal-Maker illusion.
The Verdict
So yes, Donald Trump deserves some credit — a momentary nod — for nudging a battered region toward a temporary calm. But don’t kid yourselves. This is not the Camp David Accords. It’s not Oslo. It’s not even a durable ceasefire.
It’s a PR event dressed up as diplomacy, a photo op disguised as history.
Trump calls it peace. I call it political theater with better lighting.
If peace ever comes to Gaza, it will be because cooler heads and moral courage prevailed — not because one self-absorbed man craved applause. This “deal” is another of the many Trump productions: heavy on self-congratulation, light on substance, and destined to collapse under the weight of its own exaggeration.
Such is American and international life under the leadership of Donald J. Trump.
Mark M. Bello is an attorney and author of 9 Zachary Blake Legal Thrillers and other legal themed novels and children’s books. For more information, please visit https://www.markmbello.com